NeftalyApp Courses Partner Invest Corporate Charity Divisions

Neftaly Accountants

Neftaly Email: sayprobiz@gmail.com Call/WhatsApp: + 27 84 313 7407

Tag: of

Neftaly Email: sayprobiz@gmail.com Call/WhatsApp: + 27 84 313 7407

[Contact Neftaly] [About Neftaly][Services] [Recruit] [Agri] [Apply] [Login] [Courses] [Corporate Training] [Study] [School] [Sell Courses] [Career Guidance] [Training Material] [ListBusiness/NPO/Govt] [Shop] [Volunteer] [Internships] [Jobs] [Tenders] [Funding] [Learnerships] [Bursary] [Freelancers] [Sell] [Camps] [Events&Catering] [Research] [Laboratory] [Sponsor] [Machines] [Partner] [Advertise]  [Influencers] [Publish] [Write ] [Invest ] [Franchise] [Staff] [CharityNPO] [Donate] [Give] [Clinic/Hospital] [Competitions] [Travel] [Idea/Support] [Events] [Classified] [Groups] [Pages]

  • saypro tax considerations in taxation of international R&D and innovation services in AI and SaaS

    saypro tax considerations in taxation of international R&D and innovation services in AI and SaaS

    Introduction

    In a globalized digital economy, companies engaged in AI and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) innovation face increasingly complex tax considerations—particularly when research and development (R&D) is conducted across borders. For organizations offering or investing in international R&D and innovation services, understanding the international tax landscape is critical to both compliance and competitiveness.

    This overview outlines key tax issues affecting multinational enterprises (MNEs) and tech startups, with a focus on AI and SaaS innovation across jurisdictions.

    1. Transfer Pricing for Cross-Border R&D Activities

    When R&D services are performed across jurisdictions—e.g., development in India for a parent company in the U.S.—transfer pricing rules dictate how income and costs are allocated.

    Key Issues:

    • Arm’s Length Principle: Intercompany transactions must reflect what independent parties would agree to under similar conditions.
    • Cost-Sharing Arrangements (CSAs): MNEs often enter into CSAs to spread the cost and risks of R&D across group entities, but these must comply with OECD and local tax authority rules.
    • Valuation of Intangibles: Determining the value of AI algorithms or proprietary SaaS code requires careful IP valuation, especially when transferred between countries.

    2. Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk

    When R&D services are provided to clients across borders, or teams are working in foreign markets, there is a risk of creating a permanent establishment, which can trigger tax obligations in that country.

    Risk Factors:

    • Presence of developers or project managers in the local market
    • Use of fixed facilities (e.g., rented lab space or offices)
    • Sales or customer support involvement by R&D personnel

    3. Tax Incentives and R&D Credits

    Many countries offer R&D tax incentives to attract innovation. These can provide substantial benefits—but only if structured and documented properly.

    Examples:

    • UK R&D Tax Relief: Available for SMEs and large companies engaged in qualifying R&D.
    • U.S. R&D Credit: Covers wages, supplies, and contracted research costs.
    • EU Horizon Funding & Grants: May be available for collaborative AI/SaaS R&D projects.

    Note: Using offshore development centers may disqualify some activities from local tax incentives.

    4. Withholding Tax on Cross-Border Payments

    Cross-border licensing of AI software or R&D services often triggers withholding tax in the source country, especially if IP is involved.

    Considerations:

    • Whether payments are for “services,” “royalties,” or “technical fees”
    • Application of tax treaties to reduce or eliminate withholding tax
    • Treaty shopping risks and anti-abuse rules

    5. Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership and Location

    Where IP is developed and legally held affects tax outcomes. Many tech companies use IP holding companies in low-tax jurisdictions (e.g., Ireland, Singapore, Netherlands), but this strategy is under increasing scrutiny.

    Key Considerations:

    • DEMPE Functions: Under OECD BEPS guidelines, profits from IP must align with functions: Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, and Exploitation.
    • Substance Requirements: Shell entities without real activity are being challenged.

    6. Pillar One and Pillar Two Impacts (OECD/G20 Tax Reforms)

    Global tax reforms, especially OECD Pillar One and Pillar Two, are reshaping how digital companies are taxed.

    • Pillar One: Could allocate taxing rights to market jurisdictions (where users are), even if no physical presence exists.
    • Pillar Two: Introduces a global minimum tax of 15%, impacting entities in low-tax jurisdictions.

    These reforms will affect the global structure of SaaS and AI companies significantly.

    7. SaaS Revenue Recognition and VAT/GST

    For SaaS providers delivering services internationally, tax authorities often apply Value-Added Tax (VAT) or Goods and Services Tax (GST) rules in the country of the customer.

    • VAT compliance is required in the EU, Australia, UK, etc., even without local presence.
    • Registration thresholds and digital service rules vary by jurisdiction.
    • Dual-use software (B2B vs. B2C) may trigger different tax treatments.

    Conclusion: Strategic Tax Planning for AI & SaaS R&D

    As digital innovation continues to blur geographical boundaries, businesses must navigate an evolving landscape of tax compliance, incentives, and risk. Proactive tax planning, aligned with local laws and OECD guidelines, is essential to avoid pitfalls and capitalize on global opportunities.

    How Neftaly Can Help

    Neftaly specializes in international tax strategy, helping tech innovators and SaaS companies:

    • Structure cross-border R&D operations efficiently
    • Optimize IP location and transfer pricing models
    • Access available tax incentives and navigate local compliance
    • Mitigate PE and withholding tax exposure
    • Prepare for global minimum tax and digital taxation rules

    Our tax advisory team ensures your global innovation footprint is as smart as your technology.

  • saypro tax considerations in taxation of cross-border online and digital services in AI and cloud

    saypro tax considerations in taxation of cross-border online and digital services in AI and cloud

    As artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and digital services continue to expand globally, navigating cross-border tax obligations has become increasingly complex. Neftaly helps organizations understand and manage the evolving international tax landscape for digital services, especially in the context of AI and cloud-based offerings.

    1. Changing International Tax Landscape

    The OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiatives—particularly Pillar One and Pillar Two—are fundamentally reshaping how cross-border digital revenues are taxed. Companies delivering AI solutions or cloud infrastructure must now consider nexus rules and profit allocation models that differ significantly from traditional tax regimes.

    Key Issues:

    • Expanding definition of “permanent establishment” to include digital presence.
    • Reallocation of taxing rights to market jurisdictions.
    • Minimum global tax requirements (15% under Pillar Two).

    2. Digital Services Taxes (DSTs)

    Several jurisdictions have introduced Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) targeting revenues from digital platforms, cloud services, and AI-powered applications. These are often levied on gross revenue, not profit, increasing compliance and cost burdens.

    Example DSTs:

    • France (3% on digital revenues over €750M global)
    • UK (2% on digital services revenues)
    • India (Equalisation Levy on e-commerce and online services)

    Neftaly Insight: Businesses must monitor multi-jurisdictional DSTs and consider how these interact with corporate income taxes to avoid double taxation.

    3. VAT/GST on Cross-Border Digital Supplies

    Value-Added Tax (VAT) and Goods and Services Tax (GST) regimes worldwide are applying destination-based taxation rules for digital services. AI platforms, SaaS offerings, and cloud services delivered to customers in foreign jurisdictions may now trigger indirect tax obligations.

    Compliance Requirements:

    • Local VAT registration for non-resident providers
    • E-invoicing, digital filing, and local tax representative mandates
    • Determination of the customer’s location and status (B2B vs. B2C)

    4. Withholding Taxes and Treaty Considerations

    Cross-border payments for the use of cloud infrastructure, software, or AI services may be subject to withholding tax in source countries. Classification of payments (royalty vs. service) under tax treaties significantly affects tax treatment.

    Neftaly Tip:

    • Assess whether AI or cloud transactions qualify as royalties under local law.
    • Review double tax treaties to optimize withholding tax exposure.
    • Consider permanent establishment risks triggered by remote teams or cloud nodes.

    5. Transfer Pricing and IP Structuring

    Digital service providers using proprietary AI algorithms or hosting global cloud platforms must address transfer pricing implications of intercompany transactions. The location and ownership of IP assets, data centers, and R&D functions influence tax liabilities.

    Key Considerations:

    • Valuation of AI models and software licenses
    • Cost-sharing arrangements across jurisdictions
    • DEMPE functions (Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, and Exploitation)

    6. Practical Steps for Compliance and Risk Management

    At Neftaly, we help clients navigate the complexities of cross-border digital taxation through tailored strategies, including:

    • Global tax mapping for AI and cloud service offerings
    • Tax-efficient structuring of IP and data center operations
    • Automated compliance solutions for VAT/GST registrations
    • Risk assessment for DSTs and emerging digital tax rules

    Conclusion

    Taxation of cross-border online and digital services—especially those involving AI and cloud technologies—is evolving rapidly. Companies must stay ahead of compliance requirements, manage tax exposures, and align their operational models with international tax developments.

    Neftaly’s international tax experts are here to help your business achieve full tax compliance while optimizing your global digital operations.

  • saypro tax considerations in taxation of international management and consulting agreements in digital services

    saypro tax considerations in taxation of international management and consulting agreements in digital services

    Introduction

    As businesses expand across borders and increasingly adopt digital service models, international management and consulting agreements have become both common and complex. Neftaly recognizes that the cross-border nature of these agreements creates critical tax implications for both service providers and clients. Understanding how digital services are taxed—particularly in relation to consulting and management—is essential for compliance, cost-efficiency, and operational success.

    1. Key Tax Challenges in Cross-Border Digital Consulting

    A. Characterization of Income

    • Income from digital consulting or management services can be classified as:
      • Business profits
      • Royalties
      • Technical service fees
      • Employment income (in disguised cases)
    • Proper classification is vital because it determines the applicable tax treatment under domestic laws and Double Tax Agreements (DTAs).

    B. Source of Income

    • Tax authorities may tax income based on where:
      • The service is performed
      • The client is located
      • The benefit of the service is received

    This creates complexity in determining which jurisdiction has the right to tax, particularly when services are delivered remotely via digital platforms.

    C. Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk

    • Providing digital services across borders can inadvertently create a PE in the client’s country.
    • This may trigger corporate income tax obligations and local compliance requirements.

    2. Tax Considerations for Neftaly and Its Clients

    A. Withholding Tax Obligations

    • Many countries impose withholding taxes on payments made to foreign consultants or management firms.
    • These taxes may apply even if the service provider has no local presence.
    • Neftaly should review applicable tax treaties to determine reduced rates or exemptions.

    B. VAT/GST on Digital Services

    • Value-Added Tax (VAT) or Goods and Services Tax (GST) may apply to cross-border digital services.
    • Some jurisdictions require foreign service providers to register and collect VAT/GST from local clients.
    • Neftaly must assess VAT/GST obligations based on:
      • Place of supply rules
      • Nature of client (business or individual)
      • Thresholds for registration

    C. Transfer Pricing (TP) Rules

    • For intra-group consulting or management services, arm’s length pricing is required.
    • Neftaly must maintain proper transfer pricing documentation to support charges between related entities.
    • Tax authorities may scrutinize the economic substance and benefit test of services provided.

    3. Practical Strategies for Compliance and Optimization

    A. Contractual Clarity

    • Clearly define:
      • Scope of services
      • Jurisdiction of performance
      • Payment terms and taxes
      • Dispute resolution and governing law
    • Neftaly ensures contracts support tax positions (e.g., avoiding PE creation).

    B. Tax Treaty Planning

    • Utilize applicable DTAs to:
      • Reduce or eliminate withholding taxes
      • Avoid double taxation
      • Strengthen arguments against PE creation
    • Proper residency certificates and treaty disclosures must be submitted.

    C. Use of Digital Platforms and Local Agents

    • The method of service delivery can affect tax outcomes.
    • Neftaly evaluates whether platform use (e.g., cloud-based solutions, apps) affects:
      • Source rules
      • VAT obligations
      • Nexus with foreign jurisdictions

    D. Permanent Establishment Risk Mitigation

    • Avoid frequent travel or extended stays in client countries
    • Avoid signing contracts or negotiating deals through local representatives
    • Structure agreements to emphasize remote, offshore delivery

    4. Country-Specific Issues to Consider

    • United States: Managing “Effectively Connected Income” (ECI) and state-level nexus
    • EU: Digital Services Taxes (DST) and VAT MOSS schemes
    • Africa: Growing digital tax regimes (e.g., Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa)
    • Asia: Expansion of economic nexus rules and PE definitions

    5. Neftaly’s Value-Added Tax Support Services

    Neftaly offers tailored tax advisory and compliance solutions, including:

    • International tax structuring
    • VAT/GST registration and filings
    • Withholding tax optimization
    • Permanent establishment analysis
    • Cross-border contract review
    • Transfer pricing documentation

    Conclusion

    Cross-border digital consulting and management services carry unique and evolving tax risks. With the rapid digitization of service delivery, governments are increasingly aggressive in taxing these transactions. Neftaly equips clients and partners with the knowledge and support necessary to navigate this terrain efficiently, minimize risk, and optimize tax outcomes.

  • saypro tax considerations in taxation of offshore digital subsidiaries and foreign entities

    saypro tax considerations in taxation of offshore digital subsidiaries and foreign entities

    As global markets become increasingly digital, many businesses are establishing offshore subsidiaries to expand internationally, optimize tax obligations, and leverage local market advantages. However, navigating the tax landscape for foreign entities—particularly in the digital economy—requires careful planning, compliance, and understanding of complex international tax rules.

    Neftaly provides a clear breakdown of key tax considerations to keep your offshore digital operations both compliant and strategically aligned.

    1. Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk

    One of the primary tax considerations is whether your foreign subsidiary or digital entity creates a permanent establishment (PE) in the host country. A PE may trigger local tax liabilities even if your business doesn’t have a physical presence.

    What to consider:

    • Digital presence may qualify as a PE under updated international tax rules (e.g., OECD BEPS Action 1).
    • Local tax authorities may treat regular digital sales, servers, or online customer interactions as taxable operations.
    • Review double tax treaties (DTTs) to determine PE thresholds and tax relief opportunities.

    2. Transfer Pricing and Intercompany Transactions

    If your offshore subsidiary provides services, licenses, or sells goods to the parent company or affiliates, transfer pricing rules come into play.

    Key focus areas:

    • Maintain arm’s-length pricing on all cross-border intercompany transactions.
    • Document and justify cost-sharing arrangements, especially for IP, software development, and digital services.
    • Be ready for audits and transfer pricing documentation requirements in both jurisdictions.

    3. Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) Rules

    Many countries, including the U.S., UK, and South Africa, impose CFC rules to prevent tax base erosion by taxing income earned by foreign subsidiaries that are controlled by domestic shareholders.

    Considerations:

    • Identify whether your offshore digital entity qualifies as a CFC.
    • Understand the types of passive or low-taxed income (e.g., royalties, interest, digital subscription revenue) that may be immediately taxable in the home country.
    • Plan repatriation strategies and tax deferrals accordingly.

    4. Withholding Taxes

    Payments made to or from offshore digital subsidiaries may trigger withholding tax obligations on royalties, management fees, dividends, or technical services.

    What to assess:

    • Local laws and DTTs to determine withholding tax rates.
    • Eligibility for tax treaty benefits and the need for certificate of residence or tax IDs.
    • Structure payments and contracts to avoid double taxation or unnecessary tax leakage.

    5. VAT/GST and Digital Services Taxes (DSTs)

    Many jurisdictions have implemented Value-Added Tax (VAT) or Goods and Services Tax (GST) regimes for digital services, including streaming, software, e-learning, and e-commerce.

    Implications:

    • Offshore digital businesses may be required to register for VAT/GST in the customer’s jurisdiction.
    • Failure to register and comply can lead to penalties, interest, and reputational damage.
    • Some countries (e.g., India, France, Kenya) have introduced Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) targeting foreign digital service providers.

    6. IP Structuring and Jurisdiction Selection

    Digital businesses often house their intellectual property (IP)—software, platforms, trademarks—in low-tax or IP-friendly jurisdictions.

    Best practices:

    • Choose jurisdictions with strong IP protection, tax incentives (e.g., patent boxes), and favorable DTTs.
    • Structure IP licensing and cost allocation to withstand scrutiny from both tax authorities.
    • Be mindful of economic substance requirements to support IP ownership claims.

    7. Substance, Substance, Substance

    Many jurisdictions and international frameworks now require companies to demonstrate economic substance to enjoy tax benefits. Shell companies or mere paper entities are increasingly scrutinized.

    Steps to take:

    • Establish real operations: staff, office, banking, decision-making locally.
    • Maintain local governance: minutes, board meetings, management decisions.
    • Avoid “brass plate” companies that fail the substance test.

    8. Global Minimum Tax (Pillar Two / OECD BEPS 2.0)

    With the introduction of the Global Minimum Tax (GMT) under OECD’s BEPS Pillar Two, multinational enterprises with revenues over €750 million may face a 15% minimum tax—even in low-tax jurisdictions.

    Consider:

    • How GMT affects your offshore structure.
    • Potential top-up taxes in the parent jurisdiction.
    • Reevaluate tax incentives and local rates in light of global alignment.

    Neftaly Recommendations for Offshore Digital Tax Compliance

    1. Conduct a tax risk review of your offshore entities.
    2. Engage in robust transfer pricing analysis and documentation.
    3. Assess VAT/DST obligations based on your customer base.
    4. Monitor legal and regulatory changes in digital taxation.
    5. Work with local advisors to ensure compliance and mitigate audit exposure.
    6. Centralize international tax planning to align with business goals and reduce inefficiencies.

    Conclusion

    In a world where digital operations cross borders with ease, tax obligations do not. Neftaly helps digital and multinational businesses stay ahead of the evolving tax landscape with practical, actionable, and strategic tax planning.

    If your organization operates offshore digital subsidiaries or foreign entities, it’s time to take a proactive approach to international tax compliance. Reach out to Neftaly to assess your current structure and ensure it’s optimized for both compliance and growth.

  • saypro tax considerations in taxation of cross-border software royalties and licensing fees

    saypro tax considerations in taxation of cross-border software royalties and licensing fees

    Introduction

    Cross-border software royalties and licensing fees represent a critical area of international taxation that requires careful planning and compliance. With the globalization of software development, licensing, and digital services, understanding the tax implications is essential for both licensors and licensees to minimize tax liabilities and avoid disputes.

    1. Definition of Software Royalties and Licensing Fees

    • Software Royalties: Payments made for the use, right to use, or sale of software intellectual property (IP).
    • Licensing Fees: Charges for granting permission to use software, including embedded technology, updates, or proprietary platforms.

    2. Key Tax Considerations

    a. Source of Income

    • Determining the source of royalties/licensing income is critical. Generally, income is sourced where the right is used or exploited.
    • Tax authorities may assert source rules differently, especially for digital products, impacting withholding tax (WHT) obligations.

    b. Withholding Tax (WHT) on Royalties

    • Many countries impose withholding tax on cross-border royalty payments.
    • Rates vary widely, typically ranging from 5% to 30%.
    • Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) may reduce or eliminate withholding tax rates on royalties.

    c. Permanent Establishment (PE) Risk

    • Licensing arrangements may create a PE if the software use or development occurs within the taxing jurisdiction.
    • Presence of a PE can lead to corporate income tax exposure beyond withholding tax.

    d. Characterization of Payments

    • Whether payments are treated as royalties or business profits affects taxation.
    • Some jurisdictions tax royalties at source, while business profits may be taxed only where a PE exists.

    e. Transfer Pricing Compliance

    • Intercompany software royalties/licensing fees must comply with arm’s length principles.
    • Proper documentation is necessary to support pricing and avoid adjustments and penalties.

    3. Impact of Digital Economy and BEPS Actions

    • OECD’s BEPS Action Plan, particularly Action 1 (Digital Economy) and Action 6 (Treaty Abuse), influence taxation of digital royalties.
    • Many countries are updating laws and treaties to address digital services and prevent treaty abuse.

    4. Practical Tax Planning Strategies

    a. Utilizing Tax Treaties

    • Review applicable DTAAs to optimize withholding tax rates.
    • Consider treaty benefits such as exemption clauses or reduced rates for royalties.

    b. Structuring Licensing Arrangements

    • Consider location of IP ownership, licensing entity, and user base to minimize tax exposure.
    • Use of licensing hubs in favorable jurisdictions.

    c. Documentation and Compliance

    • Maintain detailed contracts specifying nature and terms of royalties.
    • Prepare transfer pricing studies and comply with local documentation requirements.

    d. Monitoring Regulatory Changes

    • Stay updated on local tax regulations concerning digital and software royalties.
    • Engage with tax advisors regularly to adapt to evolving international tax standards.

    5. Conclusion

    Taxation of cross-border software royalties and licensing fees is complex, influenced by diverse domestic laws, tax treaties, and international tax reforms. Businesses must adopt a proactive approach to structuring, documentation, and compliance to optimize tax outcomes and avoid costly disputes.

  • saypro tax considerations in taxation of cross-border R&D collaborations in AI and cloud computing

    saypro tax considerations in taxation of cross-border R&D collaborations in AI and cloud computing

    Introduction

    As artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing continue to reshape global industries, cross-border collaborations in research and development (R&D) have become increasingly prevalent. These collaborations, while fostering innovation, introduce complex taxation challenges. Neftaly’s expertise in tax advisory highlights critical considerations for multinational enterprises engaged in R&D partnerships across jurisdictions.

    Key Tax Considerations in Cross-Border R&D Collaborations

    1. Characterization of R&D Activities

    Understanding how different jurisdictions classify R&D expenditures is fundamental. Tax treatment varies based on whether activities are categorized as:

    • Service contracts,
    • Joint ventures,
    • Licensing agreements, or
    • Cost-sharing arrangements.

    AI and cloud computing projects often involve intangible assets and services, complicating classification.

    2. Transfer Pricing Implications

    R&D collaborations require careful transfer pricing analysis to ensure compliance with OECD guidelines and local regulations. Key points include:

    • Determining the arm’s length remuneration for R&D services and shared intangibles,
    • Valuation of IP developed jointly or transferred,
    • Allocation of costs and benefits among parties in different countries.

    Neftaly emphasizes documentation and benchmarking studies to mitigate tax risks.

    3. Tax Incentives and Credits

    Many countries provide R&D tax incentives to stimulate innovation, such as:

    • Tax credits,
    • Deductions,
    • Grants, or
    • Patent boxes.

    For AI and cloud computing R&D, understanding eligibility criteria and documentation requirements is vital to maximize benefits while avoiding disputes.

    4. Withholding Taxes and Double Taxation

    Payments for cross-border R&D services may trigger withholding taxes on royalties, fees, or dividends. Mitigating double taxation risks involves:

    • Utilizing double tax treaties,
    • Applying exemptions or reduced rates,
    • Strategic structuring of collaboration agreements.

    Neftaly advises on treaty benefits and domestic rules to optimize tax outcomes.

    5. Permanent Establishment (PE) Risks

    Physical or economic presence during collaborative R&D can create PE exposure, leading to local taxation of profits. Companies must evaluate:

    • Activities that constitute a PE,
    • Duration and nature of cross-border personnel presence,
    • Structuring of operations to manage PE risk.

    AI and cloud computing projects often involve remote and digital contributions, requiring nuanced PE analysis.

    6. Intellectual Property Ownership and Tax Planning

    Ownership and location of IP assets resulting from R&D affect profit allocation and tax liabilities. Considerations include:

    • Assignment versus licensing of IP rights,
    • Location of IP development and management functions,
    • Application of nexus rules for IP income.

    Neftaly supports clients in aligning IP strategy with tax efficiency and compliance.

    Challenges Specific to AI and Cloud Computing

    • Intangibility and rapid innovation cycles make valuation and cost allocation difficult.
    • Data sovereignty and cloud infrastructure location impact taxation of services and licensing.
    • Global digital economy rules and emerging tax regulations (e.g., OECD Pillar Two) introduce further complexity.

    Conclusion

    Effective tax management in cross-border R&D collaborations for AI and cloud computing requires comprehensive understanding of international tax principles, local regulations, and evolving digital economy frameworks. Neftaly provides tailored solutions that help businesses optimize tax outcomes while fostering innovation globally.

  • Neftaly regulation of climate risk accounting in national balance sheets

    Neftaly regulation of climate risk accounting in national balance sheets

  • Neftaly oversight of ethical standards in remote auditing technologies

    Neftaly oversight of ethical standards in remote auditing technologies

  • Neftaly assurance of SDG-aligned financial disclosures in multilateral banks

    Neftaly assurance of SDG-aligned financial disclosures in multilateral banks

  • Neftaly regulation of climate-aligned accounting education programs

    Neftaly regulation of climate-aligned accounting education programs